The provided diagram illustrates how West Park secondary school developed from 1950 when it was built to 2010.
Overall, the biggest change that happened in the school is the construction of car park. However, the houses and farmland had completely disappeared by 2010.
At the first glance, the school is quite small and located in the south of the main road. Although there were few of residential houses situated in the northwest corner in 1950, they were demolished 1980 for building car park and science block. The farmland in the southwest of the map was also replaced to make sports field, while there was a maintenance of playground.
In the 1980-2010 period, car park was expanded dramatically whereas the sports field became smaller. Meanwhile, the playground was considerably narrowed in comparison with the previous period. In addition, science block was still existed in the middle of car park and main building.
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness aredecreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 78
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment. 41
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- These days, cell (mobile) phones and the internet are very important to the ways in which people relate to one another socially.Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the U.K. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, still, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20529801325 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72477727714 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629139072848 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8286061098 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169228045023 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726736591704 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613975186374 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114103062697 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435307915046 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.