The diagram below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.
Summaries the the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
As we can see, we have pictures that describes information about school building area in 2004 and in 2024. The pictures also illustrate the planning in expanding of school area in 2024.
In general, the first pictures show the description of school building site which will enrolled 600 students while the second picture gives information about the expanding of the same school in 2024 where 1000 students will be enrolled.
The first specific point is that, that in 2004, the site has only two school buildings, while in 2024, addition of another school building can be seen. Furthermore, in 2004, there is only one automobiles park but in 2024, the site has two parks for motor cars. Moving forward, we can also witness, that the area of sports ground has been decreased in 2024 planning.
Finally, talking about the sports field, we can see that both the pictures have only one sports ground but the difference is in the location. In 2004, the sports field was adjacent with school building 2 but in 2024 the location of the ground is in front of school building 3. In addition to that, in 2004 we can't see any road in the school site but it is included in 2024 site planning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ding 3. In addition to that, in 2004 we cant see any road in the school site but it ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, while, in addition, in general, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6985645933 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39679967938 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0162185894 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292956645576 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144969142608 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770025118986 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1984478379 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00879975120196 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.