The diagram illustrates the Australian Bureau Of Meteorology receiving detailed news on the climate which makes authentic future prediction.
Overall,the process is divided in 3 phases namely collecting the incoming information from satellite, receiving signals through radar and drifting buoy from sea.
First of all the incoming information which is received through satellite is analysed and forecasted in satellite photo which is processed in the computer and made public to the audience through broadcast like TV newsapaper, radio or telephonic recorded announcement.
Secondly the radar catches signal and displays it on radar screen and processed on computer and makes social through all the three means of information giving devices. The other way is of drifting buyoyancy wherein the information is received in the sea through the ships and then a synoptic chart is prepared for analysis and the broadcast is prepared on the computer and made audible or visible to audience.
To sum up the climatic prediction of weather is processed and analysed through three different techniques.
- IELTS WRITING TASK I The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 62
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- The Chart below shows the value of one country s export in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 75
- The Chart below shows the value of one country s export in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 w
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...es authentic future prediction. Overall,the process is divided in 3 phases namely c...
^^^^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... The other way is of drifting buyoyancy wherein the information is received in t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, then, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5748502994 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94430595794 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.2990526859 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.166666667 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.099541580572 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559132005553 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369744355773 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639785137568 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356909665907 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.