The diagram below shows information about carbon dioxide emissions popular private jets. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares and contrasts data on the difference in emissions of carbon dioxide, fuel consumption, and the cost of flying each jet by nine different private jets.
In general, despite the fact that there is not a perfect correlation between these three categories, higher fuel consumption and flight costs usually result in higher production levels of carbon dioxide.
Looking at the table more closely, one can see that although the cost per hour is the same at $6,750, the number of gallons of fuel used per hour by the Challenger 605 is slightly over 200 less than the Gulfstream III, with 280 and 488 gallons, respectively. In contrast, both the Hawker 400XP and the Hawker 800XP used the same amount of fuel at 188 gallons per hour, but the cost for one hour of flying is $2,700 and $4,500, respectively. The two jets most similar in running cost and fuel consumption are the Learjet 60 and the Cessna Citation XLS, as they both cost $4,500 per hour and vary by only 5 gallons per hour in fuel consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | roadtoapro | 11 | view |
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 61
- The chart below show the amount of area used for growing fruit between 1993 and 2006 in Washington State USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lthough the cost per hour is the same at ,750, the number of gallons of fuel used ...
^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., but the cost for one hour of flying is ,700 and ,500, respectively. The two jets...
^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... cost for one hour of flying is ,700 and ,500, respectively. The two jets most sim...
^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e Cessna Citation XLS, as they both cost ,500 per hour and vary by only 5 gallons ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68156424581 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52959758767 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.4394480896 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.6 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0400146111432 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289896174977 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386364501777 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0447967962793 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422997545744 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.