The diagram below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities, Derby and Nottingham, Between 2000 and 2009.
The diagram illustrates the comparison the quantity of house built per year between derby and Nottingham city from 2000 to 2009. Overall, The highest number of house built was gained by derby city in 2009, reached up to 300 houses. In contrast, the undermost occurred in 2002, 2006, as well as 2008 while Nottingham just built less than 50 houses at these times.
Furthermore, the statistic showed that from 2000 to 2003 the number of house built in derby city lean to increase slightly, it tend constant throughout 2003 to 2007, as well as escalate tremendously, which it added more than 100 houses than previously years.
Contrary, the number of house built per year in Nottingham gravitate to fluctuate unexpectedly. Only in 2000, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2007, as well as 2009 Nottingham had successful built more than 50 houses per year. However, the opposite occurred in 2002, 2003, 2006, and 2008 while nottingham just built less than 50 houses per year.
- The line graph shows the percentage of Internet users in three countries from 1999 to 2009. 73
- In many countries today insufficient respect is shown to older people.What do you think may be the reasons for this?What problems might this cause in society? 67
- Amount spent on consumer goods 78
- Some people believe that success comes from hard work. Do you agree with and why? Give specific details and examples to support your opinion. 56
- Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information. Far from being beneficial, this is a danger to our societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tends'?
Suggestion: tends
...erby city lean to increase slightly, it tend constant throughout 2003 to 2007, as we...
^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y. Only in 2000, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2007, as well as 2009 Nottingham had successfu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98136645963 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55127578676 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527950310559 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4662560345 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457199955009 0.215688989381 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255057104682 0.103423049105 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121503092077 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322502688919 0.15604864568 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103599594905 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.