The diagram below shows the process for making a water clock.

The method for making a water clock is depicted by the given process chart

The first and farmost feature is that,in first step the water is supplied with the help of tap and after that a hole is introduced in the plastic bottle and then with the help of tape the plastic bottle is attached with the stand and in next step the straw is binded at the neck of plastic bottle with help of glue and through the straw the water drops come out which is uncessary

Moving further,at the next step the water drop is come form the hole in a small quantity and it is transfered into a plastic bottle which is cutted from the neck and in next step the bottle is labelled with help of marker which described the amount and at last step the water is collected from the first container to second container

Overall,all the steps are nesessary to build the water clock if any step is missed then the hole process is haulted

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... The first and farmost feature is that,in first step the water is supplied with t...
^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... water drops come out which is uncessary Moving further,at the next step the wate...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
...ut which is uncessary Moving further,at the next step the water drop is come fo...
^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , all
...container to second container Overall,all the steps are nesessary to build the wa...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 747.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.36842105263 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.0855805055 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 171.0 22.4926829268 760% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 747.0 112.824112599 662% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 171.0 22.9334400587 746% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 23.0 5.23603664747 439% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157406540997 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157406540997 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166704307928 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153788944166 0.0819641961636 188% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 84.7 13.2329268293 640% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -76.71 61.2550243902 -125% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 66.4 10.3012195122 645% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.25 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.52 8.06136585366 180% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 70.4 10.9970731707 640% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 11.0658536585 479% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.