The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

To commence with the manufacturing black tea process, a farmer picks fresh tea leaves which can be harvested and only bud and two top leaves are picked for producing good quality tea. After that, the leaves actually experience the withering stage when the air is passed through the leaves on a rack. As a consequence, sixty percent of moisture in the leaves has evaporated.

Following that, there are two different methods employed to process the withered leaves.
One method is called a traditional one which produces loose leaf tea. The leaves are conventionally rolled until they become flat and broken. Simultaneously, a number of enzymes inside the leaves are discharged during this stage. Another one is a modern way in which tea bags are made. The leaves are cut, torn and even curled in a quick process. Meanwhile, there are some smaller granular pieces created at the same time.

What happens in the next step is that the leaves undergo an oxidation or fermentation stage in which the rolled leaves are spread on titles or cement. The enzymes with the air are released from the leaves, which results in these leaves shifting from green to copper. Finally, the leaves experience the firing process in ovens or hot dryers, which causes a flavor and aroma brought out. At the end of the whole process, 97% moisture is discharged.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-29 AnneDo 56 view
2022-09-28 AnneDo 56 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92511013216 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57512255744 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599118942731 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2416070509 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8571428571 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103339400626 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377779055613 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475581559526 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773538284744 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333765328357 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.