The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks.
The process continues with stage 3 where the carbonated drinks are pushed into a big tank to mix with coloring, syrup, and flavor before being filtered and filled into bottles as well as cans at the next step. Finally, carbonated water products packed into boxes are delivered to the supermarket to retail
The diagram details the process by which carbonated drinks are produced. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that these 5 stages of the man-made process are comprised of the filtering of raw water and the addition of carbon dioxide in the early steps, mixing with additional ingredients in the middle, and finally packaging it off to be sold.
In the beginning, raw water is cleaned by passing through a filter before a water softener and chemicals are added. The clean water is then pumped into a heater and is eventually sent through a cooling pipe to the pivotal stage where carbon dioxide is introduced to create the carbonated effect.
From there, the carbonated water is mixed with coloring, syrup, and flavors and filtered again prior to bottling and canning. The finished drinks are then boxed up and sent to supermarkets for retail.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- explain some of the ways in which human activities are damaging the environment what can the government do to address these problem 56
- The chart below shows the number of internet users in three difference countries anh the world average between 1998 and 2013 84
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks https howtodoielts com wp content uploads 2020 09 118711718 1472702139591477 4777392483489746374 o 1024x790 png
- The graph shows the estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 89
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58389097412 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56345177665 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.4569831714 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.714285714 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177565800217 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906912792363 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763033963396 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114002612174 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533632045699 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.