The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.
The two maps give information about how a small fishing village changed, it’s surrounded by a large European tourism from 1974 to 2004
Overall, the area underwater has remarkable changes, evolving from a quiet, rural settlement. However, the significant change is how much the area was built in 2004. Moreover, it can be seen clearly if we look at the specific decline.
First, look at the maps of the fishing village in 1974 ( 12,000 population). The fishing village has eight areas including fishing village, boats, harbor, woodland, village, olives, sheep and goats and village. In the underwater areas, it’s also a place to work for living conditions such as boats and a fishing village next to it, the harbor on the right. Look at the map on the right at the west, they have woodland and the village opposite them is olives plants for eating and fruit. They also have the area for livestock farming, but the main choice is sheep and goats. Finally, the other village next to it on the east side.
By 2004, the fishing village was bigger and the population had risen from 12,000 to 80,000 and 50,000 tourist beds. It also has about nine places including hotels, golf course, two beaches , original village, village and tourist shops, farm land, homes of locals and the road. At the right on the west side had hotels and a beach next to it, the golf course at the top with village and tourist shops, the opposite if the beach was the original village ( people who lived there for a long time). Next to the village is the other beach on the east, if people want to enroll in the village they have a road there. Finally, the farmland for fruit and vegetables opposite the road and next to is homes of locals. So, it can be seen that they are more and more development in the future and more open.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-17 | Trần Ánh Vy | 61 | view |
- Some people think that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programs example charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports for young children 84
- The graph and the chart below give information about migration to the UK The graph shows how long immigrants in the years 2000 2008 intended to stay in the UK The pie chart shows reason for migration in 2008 67
- Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally whereas other people think that they should concentrate only those subjects that they find interesting 89
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and future Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the average house prices in three countries between the year 1997 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the maps of the fishing village in 1974 12,000 population. The fishing village h...
^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cluding hotels, golf course, two beaches , original village, village and tourist s...
^^
Line 4, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te if the beach was the original village people who lived there for a long time. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 322.0 196.424390244 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59316770186 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25591884555 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490683229814 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 283.868780488 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4779819988 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170648199865 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573376133831 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417997044535 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117098478657 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608988103695 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.