The diagram shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram depicts how sugar is manufactured from sugar cane.
Overall, there are seven distinct stages contributing to the production of sugar, beginning with the growing process of sugar canes which takes merely 12 to 18 months on average, and ending with processed sugar being dried and cooled.
To commence with, sugar canes are grown on fields for at least one year to reach their suitable heights. When this type of sugary flora is highly probable to be harvested, workers will ensure these sugar canes will be cut off with the help of cutting tools and the involvement of machines to cultivate the speed of harvesting. After having been collected, those canes will go through the crushing machines, which can help with juice suppression.
The process then continues with the purification of juice through limestone filters before reaching the stage of evaporation. At this stage, under a high level of heat, the evaporator will ensure the sugary juice becoming syrup. Chronologically, since sugar crystals need to be separated from syrup, this liquid will be centrifuged to serve the aforementioned intention. Coming to the last stage is the crystals being dried and cooled, and the result is sugar being made and possibly being put out on marketplaces for further consumption.
- The maps give information about a university sports court 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree courses The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 89
- Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005 Plan B shows the same area in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make some comparisons where relevant 87
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000 84
- The plans show Ashford in 2010 and Ashford now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n marketplaces for further consumption.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21531100478 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7346580103 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607655502392 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3731332978 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.111111111 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197127392813 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102777383823 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10674462365 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181817202204 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113918106042 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.