The diagram shows the process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to fill land

The flow chart illustrates how plastic products are handled.

Overall, plastic products can be either turned into future recycling process or stored in landfill. Recycling process is way longer than storage of rubbish in a landfill, and contains five steps, before its turned back to retail. However, landfill process has just two stages.

In both cases, plastic products are firstly sorted by humans, after being purchased in retail stores, they are either wasted or turned into recycling collections point. If plastic product is not suitable for future recycling process, its throw into a rubbish and stored in landfill. However, if future recycling is possible, selected plastics are handled to recycling collecting point.

After being sorted in warehouse, in next step, all separated plastics are transported, by lorry, into a processing factory, where using unspecified technology and processes are turned into future products suitable for packing. Being packed, food and beverages are ready to be sold in shop. From this stage all process can be repeated.

Votes
Average: 4.2 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49090909091 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5938685915 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.1097994916 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221050740883 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101615389481 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634665204362 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138800874064 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062282545284 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.