The presented pie chart compares 4 types of vehicles in terms of the percentages they make up in people’s total utilization, while the given table indicates 5 distinct reasons for which residents travel by car. Both graphs refer to Edmonton.
Overall, car is the most prevailing means of transport among surveyed ones. In addition, it is also evident that most people choose car for work and business purposes.
Turning into detail, car accounts for the highest proportion among 4 transportations, with 45%, followed by a 35-percent rate of Light Rail Transit. By contrast, the figure for bus is remarkably lower, which accounts for only 10%. This number is equal to that of taxi, making them the least popular reviewed means of transport.
Regarding to reasons explaining why people choose cars for transportation, commuting to work occupy the biggest percentage of 55%. Meanwhile, in comparison to business, which ranks second with a proportion of 45%, the value for taking children to school is slightly lower, with precisely 40%. On the contrary, the smallest rate of 15% is shared by both leisure activities and shopping.
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 78
- High school students are usually not good at managing money. What are the reasons? What are the solutions? 84
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
- Space travel has been made sometime and people think that space tourism will be probably developed in the future. Do you think space travel would be a positive and negative development? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, second, so, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24590163934 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90632308017 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655737704918 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7804178367 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0883289287507 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380474943568 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265483802764 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566445585084 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154950883383 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.