The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960.
The maps show the developments that occurred at Queen Mary hospital during a 40-year period from 1960 to 2000.
It is clear that the biggest change that happened was the construction of a cancer center. Additionally, a shopping center and farmland had completely vanished by 2000.
In 1960, the hospital was located in the south of the main road. There was a shopping center to the northwest corner, but this center was demolished in 1980 to make way for a cancer center and a pharmacy. Farmland was also destroyed and replaced by a nursing school, while a car park in the southeast still existed.
Between 1980 and 2010, the cancer center was extended, the nursing school was moved a little to the east, forcing the car park to become smaller. Meanwhile, the pharmacy and the hospital still remained close to the main road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | karan dadral | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | MaganpreetSingh | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Dang Thi Truc Linh | 22 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Shivani Jani | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Hoang Luan | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 67
- The graph shows weekly expenditure on fast food in Britain by food and income group. 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 687.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8041958042 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57331255448 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559440559441 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 193.5 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5850956134 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.875 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121018979357 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641620297661 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834359152833 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951007202725 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919491116162 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.