The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three diagrams compare the innovation in Queen Mary Hospital’s construction size over the past forty years in three milestones 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the facilities for medical and healthcare services have been increased rapidly over three periods.
We can see that in 1960, on Main Road, Queen Mary Hospital had only one block, accounting for a quarter of the plot and the rest of land area were Shopping Center, Farmland and Parking Lot. But by 1980, the size of whole Queen Mary had changed much. There was Cancer Center, Pharmacy and Nursing School, with the Hospital’s and Nursing School’s as two of the three largest areas on Main Road. In addition, the Shopping Center and Cultivated Land have been fully exploited for health development. It is worth mentioning that in 2000, the Cancer Center became the largest block of whole area and the area of the Nursing School and the Car Park was also narrowed while the area of the Hospital and Pharmacy remained the same.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-03-30 | mohd shaiq | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- International visitors to New Zealand transport used during visit 36
- The graphs below show the average monthly expenditure on children s sports and participation in different sports in UK from 2008 to 2014 82
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The chart shows the numbers of tourists to Phu Quoc in the years from 2012 to 2015.Summary the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The three diagrams compare the innovati...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The three diagrams compare the innovation in Queen Mary Hospital&ap...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee milestones 1960, 1980 and 2000. Overall, the facilities for medical and ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased rapidly over three periods. We can see that in 1960, on Main Road, Q...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ital's and Nursing School's as two of the three largest areas on Main R...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0119047619 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61338673935 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.542305598 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141180396437 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722713806846 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503309822879 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951141249986 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507880054038 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.