the diagrams below show existing and proposed floor plan for the redevelopment of an art gallery.
The maps illustrate the current layout and the plan for new recreational of a gallery floor.
It is noticeable that the main changes will be made in terms of the use of the floor space in the gallery. And there will be a completely new entrance and more exhibition space.
At present, visitors enter the gallery through doors leading to the lobby. However, in the new plan, the entrance is planned to be moved to the Parkinson Court’s side of the building, and visitors will be able to walk straight into the exhibition area. In the place of the lobby and office areas, there are proposals for a new education area and a small storage area.
The permanent exhibition space is going to be twice as large as it is now because it will occupy the areas which are now used for temporary exhibitions. The room shown in red on the existing plan and is not part of the gallery will also be a new room for special exhibitions.
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their time. Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 89
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 78
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write a 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47928994083 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55786983344 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526627218935 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7351367704 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.625 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146682193413 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695384355046 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532076315754 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101183467215 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363617647496 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.