The diagrams below show the floor plans for a trade conference in 2009 and the same conference in 2010
The diagrams compared changes in the layout of the same trade conference in 2009 with the following year.
Overall, over one year, the number of seatings and display stands were increased.
In 2009, the refreshments area was between the main and the side entrance, and the registration was on the right side of the diagram, in front of the balcony. But in 2010, the refreshments and registration changed places. Moreover, space for registration was narrowed down and the lounge area was added to the balcony
A conference hall with a stage was opposite the main entrance in 2009, with the three meeting rooms located below. However, in the next year, the conference halls, without meeting rooms, had more seats and moved to the area where the exhibition area stood in 2009. Therefore, in 2010, the exhibition place with more display stands provided, was moved to opposite the main entrance, also the previous place for the conference hall.
- The diagrams show changes to a medical centre from 2008 to 2010 60
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 61
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The rise in the crime rate presents a major concern for today s society The question of whether nature or nurture is the main trigger for crimes remains a topic of debate Although people s nature can also be a contributing factor I would agrue that surrou 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'refreshments'' or 'refreshment's'?
Suggestion: refreshments'; refreshment's
...ay stands were increased. In 2009, the refreshments area was between the main and the side ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00636942675 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59941292286 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515923566879 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5768904492 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248967671802 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118834129055 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095893716511 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151248032638 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123921050455 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.