The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment.

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment.

The given three diagrams depicts the process of improving cooking device. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident that there are three distnict stages fire to eventually more complex equipments.
It can be seen that, At the first stage in the development of cooking equipment, there was simple cooking pot balanced on three stones. Over a fire glass, the second diagram reveals how the same equipment was used by building a shield which was made of clay around the fire. It was used to prevent heat loss and to protect the fire from wind.
It is crystal clear, At the final stage on the diagram, the fire was completely enclosed by a metal base whereas, it increase the control of heat and level of protection. There is a door where air can enter and ash can removed. Charcoal used as a fuel and it is burnt on the grate of charcoal which was inside of shield line made with clay. In addition to this, there are metal supports so that a pot can balance on the stove and hand for easy transportation.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-24 Tran Mai Phuong 78 view
2018-10-20 Hundal 56 view
2018-09-06 Ajayvir 73 view
2018-07-03 Anureet kaur 78 view
2018-07-03 Jhand raman 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...ly enclosed by a metal base whereas, it increase the control of heat and level of protec...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, whereas, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55675675676 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52569555904 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2244821508 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183240043549 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668875280775 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100319983063 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10704408219 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601923691083 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.