The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment

The three diagrams illustrate the process of improving cooking equipment. All of the stages were used some type of material.
There are 3 stages of improving process. The first stage is that there 3 stones in the same layer. They help to hold the pot and block the fire from the wind. Next stage the equipment was improved a little bit. This step also used the stones and they covered with clay. There is the door to put firewood and take the ash. The last stage there are complex of equipment which used and there are 2 main layer. There is door for entering the air and escaping for ash, handle to comfortable for load. On top of the equipment 3 supporter metal to put and the center of 2 layer has gate for charcoal. The first equipment was completely simple and the last one is really improved and it can control the heating.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...process of improving cooking equipment. All of the stages were used some type of material....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...Next stage the equipment was improved a little bit. This step also used the stones and the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 400, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'layers', 'lays'?
Suggestion: layers; lays
...uipment which used and there are 2 main layer. There is door for entering the air and...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 575, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'gated'.
Suggestion: gated
...al to put and the center of 2 layer has gate for charcoal. The first equipment was c...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, really, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 677.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3961038961 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23082901121 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.7984708305 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 56.4166666667 112.824112599 50% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8333333333 22.9334400587 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.91666666667 5.23603664747 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206626616331 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756324950408 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606524545785 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163015990534 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00510401212806 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.7 13.2329268293 43% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.68 61.2550243902 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.35 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.49 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.4329268293 39% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.