The diagrams show the development of BRIGHTSEA in the coastal area since 1950 and its planned development in the future
The diagrams illustrate some changes and planned development in the BRIGHTSEA along the coastal zone.
Overall, the coastal BRIGHTSEA has been developed to be accessible for a tourism purpose and it will then become bigger in the future with more complete facilities for the convenience of the tourists.
In 1995, the BRIGHTSEA area was known as the place to lean the boat when fishermen went and back from the ocean or transportation purposes. This area has been changed with some basic facilities to support tourism. It can be seen in the construction of the road to make this place more accessible. As a result, a shop and hotel have been built as well as a cafe has replaced a fishermen's cottage building. Additionally, the first wharf of the ferry has been manufactured to support transportations.
In the future, the location of BRIGHTSEA will be transformed to become bigger places for tourism destinations by changing cafe in the North West to be apartments with a restaurant behind them. A shop and hotel will be extended and the former will be supported with parking area its behind or in the front of apartment blocks. In the south-east area, a sailing-club building will be set up as well as additional ferry wharf in the south-east area with telecommunication antenna above it.
- The charts below give information about the work carried out by a regional environmental group over five years 11
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives.What kind of problem can this cause? What solutions can you suggest? 78
- The diagrams show the development of BRIGHTSEA in the coastal area since 1950 and its planned development in the future 92
- There is an increasing number of purchasing cars for the first time.What are the problems? What are the solutions? 73
- The charts below give information about the percentage of the budget spent on some activities and the results of the activity which did by an environmental group over five years at the local level. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97247706422 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04263672592 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4824669717 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194161797333 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806835051502 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101645920544 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16207609257 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11595264088 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.