The diagrams show total global population between 1900 and 2000, and its proportions according to region.
The line graph gives information about the total number of people in the world over the course of 100 years starting from 1900. The pie charts illustrate the allocation of the world population in term of area in two separate years 1900 and 2000.
Looking at the line graph, it is evident that there was an upward trend in the global population over a 100-year period starting from 1900. As can be inferred from data in pie charts, the world population mainly allocated in Asia during the examined period.
With respect to the line graph, the global population registered nearly 2 billion in 1900, followed by a slight fluctuation during a 70-year period, prior to sharply climbing to 6 billion by the end of the time frame, in 2000.
As regards the pie charts, the total number of people in the world in 1900 was a quarter of that in 2000. In 1900, Asia represented a significant proportion of the aggregate world population, equivalent to 60% in 1900. This figure modestly declined to more than half in 2000. Experiencing a similar pattern, the percentage of global population distributing in Europe considerably fell about 11% from 24% in 1900.
By 1900, Africa accounted for a meager proportion of the global population, equivalent to 4% and then this figure experienced an increase to 10% in 2000. A similar trend was seen in Latin America, as its proportion constitutes only 3% in 1900, but it rose significantly to 8% by the end of surveyed period. The global population allocating in North America and other regions stabilized at 5% for the former and 3% for the later over the time frame. In particular, a new region namely Middle East and North America was shown in the pie chart in 2000 with 6% of the world population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | Phạm Phú Trường | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Phạm Phú Trường | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | hienneu98 | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, as regards, in particular, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 965.302439024 149% => OK
No of words: 302.0 196.424390244 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76158940397 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73771181936 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490066225166 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3765644044 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.615384615 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294116145961 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111957957269 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365404376974 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168743956159 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553832496645 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.