Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (high acid levels are measured by low pH values).Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health.

The line graph displays acid level in the mouth from consumption of sugar and honey that can lead to tooth decay.

Overall, the intake of honey is shown to be relatively safe in comparison to fruit sugar and cane sugar. According to the graph, the lower the pH level, the higher the acidity. Furthermore tooth decay occurs at pH levels less than 5.5, with fruit sugar and cane sugar taking a longer time to transition from dangerous acid levels to a level where to tooth decay is less likely to occur.

On consuming sugar or honey there is an increase in acidity within the first five minutes, with cane sugar causing acidity to rise to a staggering 2 on the pH scale. Cane sugar takes over 30 minutes to reach a level of safety. This is a dramatic difference to honey that causes the acidity level in the mouth to rise from a 7 to almost 5 but takes slightly under 15 minutes to climb to the level where tooth decay is unlikely.

We can see from the graph that fruit sugar makes the acidity in the mouth rise to almost 4.5 and nearly 20 minutes to fall to 5.5. This concludes that honey is the safest intake in-terms of sugar and causes the least side effects concerning dental health.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...r the pH level, the higher the acidity. Furthermore tooth decay occurs at pH levels less th...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43636363636 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20529040834 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.0359750439 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232739253532 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120635181553 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720728031921 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173631378685 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342876202772 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.