The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children sport between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sport in Britain over the same time period.
The two given line graph describes the average monthly parents in Britain pay on their children sport's activity and the number of children participated in football, swimming, and athletes over the period 2008-2014.
At first glance in the first chart, in 2008, parents paid 20 pounds per month on children's sport. Over the six following years, the amount of money spent every month increased steadily, approximately 33 pounds in 2014.
In the second chart, by 2008, football was the most interesting sport with the highest number of members. During the period time, there was no notable change, the members remained stably on top around 8.5-9 million.
Illustrated in blued line, over the years, the number of children joins in swimming rose gradually from 2 million to nearly 4 million members. However, in the first two years, less than 1 million children practising athletes. By 2012, the number of children increased significantly up to ten times compared to the year 2012, but not for a long time, it tended to fall slightly in 2014.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by reporting and selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of enery in the USA since 1980 with the projection until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 78
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections in 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05780346821 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57374120824 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630057803468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6579121992 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396808791027 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15752037698 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959930287287 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229912698724 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692539063282 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.