The line graphs illustrate that British parents waste their money on their children’s sporting activities and the participation of British children in three different sports from 2008 to 2014.
It can be seen clearly from the chart that the average monthly money which British parents spend on the children’s sports increased steadily, meanwhile the number of children who took part in football, athletics, and swimming rose.
In 2008, parents in British paid 20 pounds for their children to participate in sporting activities. There was a dramatic growth in the amount of money which the parents spent on their children’s sports in British over the period of four years, approximately 31 pounds.
The number of children taking part in football and athletics remained stable, while there was a slight increase in the attendance of children in swimming, about nearly 7,5 millions, 0,5 millions and 2,4 millions respectively between 2008 and 2010. In the next four years, the participation of children in football and swimming grew moderately, around 9 millions and 4 millions. Besides, the number of children attending athletics climbed significantly, approximately 5 millions, and was as high as swimming from 2010 to 2012.
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- Nowadays people have little awareness of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as high as swimming from 2010 to 2012.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43005181347 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95942474999 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.9362859358 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.714285714 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440723674623 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216596139996 0.103423049105 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113498186839 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292102321907 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100855604915 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as high as swimming from 2010 to 2012.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43005181347 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95942474999 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.9362859358 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.714285714 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440723674623 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216596139996 0.103423049105 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113498186839 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292102321907 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100855604915 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.