The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar

The first chart illustrates how power is used in an average Australian family. The second chart portrays the total energy use from greenhouse gas emissions. There are 6 energy, namely, water heating, refrigerator, other appliances, lighting, cooling, and heating.
Overall, the Australian family has the highest energy use for water heating and the lowest cooling. However, the biggest household greenhouse gas is produced by water heating, and the smallest is from cooling.
To begin with, heating uses 42% of the energy in Australian houses. Nonetheless, cooling just uses 2% of energy. The energy compared with refrigerators, other appliances, lighting, and cooling used just under 10% of energy just under 10%.
However, Australian households made the biggest gas emission from water heating. In contrast, heating just produced 15% gas. Gas emission from cooling was the smallest. It makes just 5%. Other appliances produced more emissions, as much as 28%. Meanwhile, refrigerators, lighting, and cooling produced emissions of under 15%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, nonetheless, second, while, in contrast, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62658227848 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84470261354 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2432619136 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.5 112.824112599 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.2857142857 22.9334400587 49% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315154527929 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121141191374 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101722719494 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205489576948 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830144008989 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.19 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, nonetheless, second, while, in contrast, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62658227848 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84470261354 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2432619136 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.5 112.824112599 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.2857142857 22.9334400587 49% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315154527929 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121141191374 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101722719494 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205489576948 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830144008989 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.19 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.