The line chart delineates the number of foreign travelers visiting different parts of a particular European country during a twenty-year period.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is obvious that the quantity of foreign individuals visiting a country in European had a tendency to increase most of the period. Meanwhile, the regions that the majority of foreign individuals visiting were the coastal areas.
As is presented in the chart, it can be seen that the number of overseas travelers who visited the Lakes ranked last in the first year of the period, reaching 10.000 people, however, it began to rise shapely and peaked at 75.000 after 15 years. Meanwhile, the number of foreign residents visiting the coastal regions ranked first and stood at 40.000, after five years, this figure dropped gradually by 5.000 before witnessing a significant rise. In addition, the number of travelers from other countries visiting the mountainous areas underwent an increased fluctuation and reached 30.000 visitors in the year 2000.
By the year 2002, the number of foreign travelers to the Lakes witnessed a substantial decline to 50.000, relinquishing the top spot to the coastal regions. Following that, the figure for foreign travelers to the coast was almost doubled in comparison to the first year of the period shown. Lastly, the data for the mountainous area went up minimally in the last five year.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information abouth the percentage of population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 10
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart shows the number of hours worked by men women per week in Australia in 2007 Summarise information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21145374449 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75021147913 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541850220264 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8491142517 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.444444444 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121449496456 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579377708854 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529766829989 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085178064512 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461054046469 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.