The first chart below shows the number of British visitors to the US and American visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015. The second chart shows the amount spent by those visitors in that period.
The first bar chart represents the number of UK tourists visiting the US alongside that of US tourists coming to the UK, whereas the second bar chart illustrates the spending behaviour of these groups between 2011 and 2015.
Overall, it is clear that the number of UK visitors to the US, and their total monetary contribution surpass those of their American counterparts coming to the UK.
Looking in the first bar chart, one can see that the number of British tourists to the US dipped to a low point of less than three million between 2011 and 2013, before rebounding to a peak of 3.5 million in 2015. The number of Americans visiting the UK remained relatively stable around the 2.8 million mark in 2011 and 2012, but it slipped to a low of 2.5 million in 2013. However, the number reached its highest point of about 3.2 million in 2015.
As for the second chart, it is evident that the spending of UK tourists in the US grew gradually between 2011 and 2013, from 3.8 billion to 4 billion USD. Yet, in the second half of the 5-year period, it skyrocketed to slightly less than 6 billion dollars. For US tourists, their spending remained relatively constant around the $2.9 billion mark in the first two years, before climbing and reaching a pinnacle of around $4 billion by 2015.
- The government should sometimes infringe on people s freedom for the security of society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 85
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the profit made by MG Entertainment from different formats in three European countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imbing and reaching a pinnacle of around billion by 2015.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, second, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68421052632 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45759277231 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469298245614 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2652091924 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316401311959 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132871393518 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707679315583 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19168790873 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426897673992 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.