The charts compare eight different pastimes in the USA in two seperate year 1999 and 2009.
It is clear from the graphs that walking by far was the most widely enjoyed activity by Americans. Additionally, swimming and aerobics witnessed the most dramatic changes during the research period.
In 1999, almost 30% of those surveyed participated in walking during their free time, followed by 17% of America people enjoyed soccer. Meanwhile, the figures for swimming, camping and jogging were relatively lower, at 9%, 8% and 7% respectively. By contrast, it can be seen that not many people living in the USA interested in yoga, at only 5%.
In 2009, the proportion of people walking in their free time had a slight increase to 31%. Likewise, the percentage of people played soccer had a 1% rise to 18%. However, the figures for swimming and aerobics experienced the most significant changes. While the swimming proportion doubled to 18%, the percentage of people took part in aerobics declined to only 4% in 2009.
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 81
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 76
- The map below is of the town of Gartsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town, The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 84
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth. 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04142011834 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71403547984 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621301775148 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.3749820144 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103982313163 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396123918951 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369357142753 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674631572024 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212493234612 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.