In contemporary society, walking is becoming less popular among individuals. This problems is caused by some factors, and it should be dealt with by some effective solutions.
There are some reasons why people now reluctant to have a walk regularly. The first reason is the lacking in facilities for pedestrians. Grounds are used to build roads and skyscrapers so there are not enough pavements and sidewalks for walking purpose. Furthermore, take my country as an example, walkers are having a hard time because the majority of pavements are being illegally arrogated for commercial purposes, which means people have to use cars or motorbikes instead. The second reason is that people are more and more busy than before so they don't have time for regular walking. Today, people have to spend many hours at work and for commuting, therefore, they have to save time by using other types of transportation such as cars or buses. Additionally, many public places are now covered with technological applications like electric lifts or escalators so people choosing them over traditional stairs due to theirs convenience.
In order to raise people's interests in walking, there are some workable solutions can be adapted. Firstly, governments should attract more people to having a walk on a daily basis. By running advertising campaigns to promote the benefits of walking, governments can draw people's attention and more people will choose to walk regularly. For example, my country's government starts an annual walking festival in every March and this year recorded for almost 10,000 participants. Secondly, taxes should be spent on building more sidewalks and parks. For example, a park in the city centre and near office buildings can be a great place for citizens and office workers to have a walk daily.
In conclusion, I believe that the mentioned measures can certainly encourage people to walk on a daily basis.
- The chart below give information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 38
- Some people think it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 89
- The graph and pie chart below give information on in house training courses in a large financial company 78
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ecoming less popular among individuals. This problems is caused by some factors, and...
^^^^
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...opular among individuals. This problems is caused by some factors, and it should b...
^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... more and more busy than before so they dont have time for regular walking. Today, p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2064516129 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83029544756 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3832738765 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240773959462 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090227326803 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735308757468 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161202333153 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764415816907 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.