GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010
The two charts compare the differences in ratio GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. Overall as can be seen from the charts that Japan was a country with most significant increases and Tunisia was a country that has a down percentage for the pas 4 years.
GDP Tunisia was comprised of 6.3% in the first years, the second years decline until 2% to 4.3%, the next year also decrease 1.2% became 3.1% and the last year in 2010 this showed only a very go down 0.1%. Japan versus turn around with Tunisia, because Japan significantly rise every years. 2% in 2007 go up 6.5% in 2010.
Ecuador, the last countries surveyed constitutes which has a GDP growth was inconsistent, it was fluctuate every years in 2007 the GDP growth was 3.2%. In second years half boom to 4.9% in next year Ecuador was drop drastically from 4.9% to 1.3% and than in 2010 peak to 1.3% to 2.3%.
- The bar charts shows co2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union and European Union funds being spent on different forms of transportation. 78
- Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations? 56
- Pie chart below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 56
- GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 73
- The government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think the extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus ministry should not waste money 38
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: WAS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprised' or 'consisted of' or 'was composed of'?
Suggestion: comprised; consisted of; was composed of
...ntage for the pas 4 years. GDP Tunisia was comprised of 6.3% in the first years, the second yea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fluctuated'.
Suggestion: fluctuated
...s a GDP growth was inconsistent, it was fluctuate every years in 2007 the GDP growth was ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
... drop drastically from 4.9% to 1.3% and than in 2010 peak to 1.3% to 2.3%.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 729.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47239263804 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34233739438 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4346826146 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453270914645 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22778519413 0.103423049105 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.211263695649 0.0843802449381 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312417188188 0.15604864568 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123415925646 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.