The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to
1990.
The line graph illustrates how much fast food was consumed in the UK over the course of 20 years, starting in 1970. Units are measured in grams.
Overall, the consumption of hamburger and fish and chips increased over the period, while the figure for pizza decreased slightly. It is also noticeable that although pizza was consumed most in the first 10 years, its position was replaced by fish and chips for the remaining period.
In 1970, around 300 grams of pizza was eaten by the British, whereas people in the UK consumed just under 100 grams of fish and chips and approximately 30 grams of hamburger. In the next 10 years, there was a gradual decline to about 200 grams in the consumption of pizza. Meanwhile, the amount of fish and chips and hamburger consumed by British people rose steadily, at 150 and 90 grams respectively.
During the rest of the period, the amount of fish and chips experienced a significant increase and become the most prevailing fast food in 1990, at 500 grams, while the figure for hamburger went up to 300 grams. At the same time, the amount of pizza remained stable, at roughly 200 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | ngontube | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-26 | doremonvip123 | 73 | view |
- the chart shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 47
- The chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 84
- The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national andinternational fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70202020202 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53692755679 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510101010101 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8180001161 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102809722121 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474387109233 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667388311657 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798378861851 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071155445529 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.