The given line graph demonstrates fruit production in 4 countries France Spain Germany and Turkey between 1970 and 2010

Essay topics:

The given line graph demonstrates fruit production in 4 countries: France, Spain, Germany and Turkey between 1970 and 2010.

The line graph above shows us some data about the 4 selected Europeon countries’ production of fruit in 40 years starting from the 1970.
As we can see in the illustration, on the top is always Spain with the highest amount of fruit produced that no other countries can reach for 4 decades straight. Beside that, Turkey had a tendency to go up for the whole progress and Germany looks like sliding down.
In the first year, the figure shows the bottom position is sit by France with the amount of production only more than 1 million of tonnes. Got mentioned recently, Spain hold the crown for the whole time, in 1970 the quantity pentadrupled as much as France. Talking more about Spain, it reached its’ peak in 1980, just 30 years later this countries’ production falldown exquisitely but still having the crown. In the year of 1990, Germany dive down intensively and only got 1.5 million tonnes produced fruit at that year. That number held still till 2000 and then dropped a tad with only 0.25 millions in 2010.
About France, its’ figure went up and down then go up, the line break down between 1990 and 2000. After that, France had the competent to rise up quickly and dramatically, we can guess the line still gonna go up after 2010. In addition, Turkey also tended to go up and did not have any sign of falling down, it reached the number of 3.5 millions at the end of 2010

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-25 nlinh1612 56 view
2022-09-19 Ngan Adelia view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph above shows us some data about the 4 se...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sat'.
Suggestion: sat
...the figure shows the bottom position is sit by France with the amount of production...
^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Spain) must be used with a third-person verb: 'holds'.
Suggestion: holds
...f tonnes. Got mentioned recently, Spain hold the crown for the whole time, in 1970 t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: YOURS_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: An apostrophe is never used to form possessive case pronouns. Did you mean: 'its'?
Suggestion: its
...e. Talking more about Spain, it reached its’ peak in 1980, just 30 years later this ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... its’ peak in 1980, just 30 years later this countries’ production falldown exquisit...
^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Germany) must be used with a third-person verb: 'dives'.
Suggestion: dives
...the crown. In the year of 1990, Germany dive down intensively and only got 1.5 milli...
^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: DESCEND_DOWN[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'dive'.
Suggestion: dive
...the crown. In the year of 1990, Germany dive down intensively and only got 1.5 million to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: YOURS_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: An apostrophe is never used to form possessive case pronouns. Did you mean: 'its'?
Suggestion: its
... 0.25 millions in 2010. About France, its’ figure went up and down then go up, the...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, so, still, then, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56175298805 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34871286449 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593625498008 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4580416859 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.090909091 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260225412545 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901684432665 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487182444045 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156377886287 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482208964131 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.