Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the the statement?
Spending money on railway by government is widely discussed but still yields no conclusion. Some critics might see that this transportation is located far from their residents and has dense of crowd in rush hour, while some supporters may see that this railway is convenience transportation for modern life and fast vehicle. In my opinion, I totally agree with the latter because the benefits do outweigh their drawbacks.
However, some advocators would claim that this rapid transportation is not suitable for people in surburb or any area because government need to provide money to construct many stations that cause the pollution and noise for people in that area. Still, I found that this argument is invalid since after the construction people obtain the quality vehicle and systematic transportation in city. It leads to reduce the problem such as accidents from vehicle in road (car and motorcycle). Therefore, is it the suitable time that the government spend money for construct the railway?
On top of that, normal vehicle always emiss pollution (smog and dust) or greenhouse gas (Carbon dioxide) to the atmosphere, this pollution cause diseases for people or acid rain that destroy building made from lime. So using of railways can solve this problem. Besides, using railways people can save their time because they would know correct timetable when the train arriving or leaving in each station. MRT, for example.
In conclusion, although railways present some minor cons, it poses the significant pros to people in various ways. So I’d like to suggest that the government spend money on this convenience transportation and keep developing to remain in the future.
- large city or small town 78
- the chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- Large city and small town 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the the statement? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[5]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
... can save their time because they would know correct timetable when the train arrivi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24444444444 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76298282189 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1038272442 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134969552963 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604849723769 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668457728479 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904705901654 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412859246826 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.