The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life
Given is the bar graph illustrating the data on extinct animals from 2000 to 2010 while the pie chart presents the figure for threats to plant life.
Overall, it is evident that extinction rates are increasing from 2000 to 2060. It is noticeable that the percentage of human impact is higher than natural events.
A more detailed look at the pie chart reveals that the rate of people’s influence is four times more than natural events. For people’s impact, plantations account for the least percentage, at 4.7% while agriculture has the most proportion, at 18.7%. The figure for invasive species is lower compared to disturbance, at 4.9% and 5.3% respectively, whereas the data on logging is higher than livestock, from 9.7% and 7.7%. Besides, the proportion of harvesting is higher compared to development, at 14.4% and 10.4%, and other human influences take up 5.4%. For natural events, the percentage of natural disasters is less than other natural events, at 7% and 11.2%.
Moving onto the pie chart, it can be clearly seen that between 2000 and 2020, the rate of species extinctions increased slightly from 5.000 million to 10.000 million while with the prediction from 2060 to 2100, the number of species extinctions decrease steeply from 59.000 million to 30.000 million. In contrast, with the prediction between 2040 and 2060, the data on those species grow rapidly, from 25.000 million to 50.000 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-25 | nguyễn nga | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | nguyễn nga | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | nguyễn nga | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | nguyễn nga | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | nguyễn nga | 73 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life 78
- The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life 73
- The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han natural events. For people’s impact, plantations account for the least percen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09871244635 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64474509887 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545064377682 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3434073845 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13168832425 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533585454756 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775450190077 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104179263682 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966729284274 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.