The Graph and Table bellow give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries from 1900 to 2000
The initial illustration demonstrates the amount of water usage for agriculture, industrial, and household in global scale over a century, commencing from 19000, while the table highlights the consumption of water in two nations, i.e., Congo and Brazil in 2000. At the onset, the majority of water is used for agriculture and minor portion for household.
To start with, the level of water spent for cultivation witnessed a rapid improvement from five hundred cubic meters in the first sequence to five times higher in 2000. Research involving two nations, Brazil and Congo, demonstrated an overview of water usage for farming where Brazil expanded more water for irrigation than Congo. On the other hand, both industrial and household ceaselessly changed between 1900 and 1930 onward. However, industrial experienced a graduate increase in the beginning of 40 to reach almost 1500 cubic meters in 2000. Household in the contrary, remain unchanged but slightly in the end of the sequence.
- Most Employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion? 56
- Some people say the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give your own opi 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problemsTo what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- Formal exams are used to assess student at the end of each semester in many countries. Why are these exams used by school and universities? What are other types of assessments are possible? 61
- The graph bellow shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in United Kingdom in 1970, 1990 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, while, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31847133758 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84473174157 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624203821656 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0625981689 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228208204312 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922855354886 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741231395867 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195283219436 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473075186265 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.