The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two
different countries.
The graph shows how the amount of water used worldwide changed between 1900 and 2000.
Throughout the century, the largest quantity of water was used for agricultural Purposes, and this increased
dramatically from about 500 km³ to around 3,000 km³ in the year 2000. Water used in the industrial and domestic
sectors also increased, but consumption was minimal until mid-century. From 1950 onwards, industrial use grew
steadily to just over 1,000 km³, while domestic use rose more slowly to only 300 km³, both far below the levels of
consumption by agriculture.
The table illustrates the differences in agriculture consumption in some areas of the world by contrasting the amount
of irrigated land in Brazil (26,500 km³) with that in the Congo (100 km²). This means that a huge amount of water is
used in agriculture in Brazil, and this is reflected in the figures for water consumption per person: 359 m³ compared
with only 8 m³ in the Congo. With a population of 176 million, the figures for Brazil indicate how high agriculture water
consumption can be in some countries.
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 61
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization.Why might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 61
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 67
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09444444444 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80965596945 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4863292624 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3039126754 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148932313634 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565236129546 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118930547979 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542255200116 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.