The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The following graph and table provide some knowledge about the consumption of water around the world and the usage of water in two different countries.
Overall, the world is divided in sectors, and it has been noticed that the agriculture section use plenty of water. Meanwhile, the domestic use only consumes the least amount of water. In addition, it has been spotted that Brazil sucked in more water than Congo in 2000.
To begin with, the graph shows that the rate at which the usability of water to the agriculture sector is increasing. After, it began to rapidly grow after 1960, until it reached 3000 km cubed in 2000. On the other hand, the other two sectors, industrial use and domestic use, kicked off from the same point 0 km cubed. Furthermore, industrial sector’s pace was developing steeply, but the domestic section was rising at a slower rate.
In addition, the population in Brazil is 176 million, but in Congo was only 5.2 million. Therefore the water redemption of Brazil is 351m cubed higher than of Congo. Moreover, irrigated land needs water, so Brazil has 26,500 km cubed of land and Congo has 100 km cubed, resulting in Brazil devouring more water.
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the USA and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. 78
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need .Others say that advertisement tell us about new products that may improve our lives . 67
- In education and employment, some people work harder than others. Why do some people work harder? Is it always a good thing to work hard? 61
- The table below gives information about UK independent films . 56
- In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could .Why do you think this is ? What can be done to change this ? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge of water in two different countries. Overall, the world is divided in sec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ked in more water than Congo in 2000. To begin with, the graph shows that the ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... section was rising at a slower rate. In addition, the population in Brazil is...
^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ion, but in Congo was only 5.2 million. Therefore the water redemption of Brazil is 351m ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lting in Brazil devouring more water.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89603960396 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53449875765 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.462510516 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9090909091 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299411517472 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115634948044 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127579136648 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219215989547 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157000761589 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.