The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
A glance at the provided graph and table reveals the figures for water usage in the world. Information in the graph displays the quantity of water used globally in each sector from 1900 to 2000 whereas the table shows data on water consumed in Brazil and Congo in 2000.
Overall, the water demand for agriculture, industrial, and domestic fields rose significantly during the period shown. Moreover, from the table, the consumption of water in Brazil was dwarfed by the one in Congo in 2000.
In 1900, the water usage from agriculture ranked first with nearly 500 km following by industrial and domestic sectors with a similar figure (nearly 100 km). Then, the figure for agriculture increased rapidly by over 500 km, while the data on industrial use and domestic use saw modest growth and shared a comparable figure. Nevertheless, ultimately, the figure for industrial use increased more rapidly than the one for domestic use and reached its maximum threshold at over 1000 km. Furthermore, the peak of was about three times as high as that of industrial field.
In 2000, the residents of Brazil and Congo were 176 million and 5.2 million, respectively. Besides, irrigated land in Brazil, with 26,500 km, also much higher than that in Congo. In comparison to water consumption for each, therefore, the figure for Brazil was more than.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04484304933 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66324678319 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538116591928 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2044794295 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.272727273 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206111669078 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087506728539 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738797866654 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146222733126 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921722187658 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.