Essay topics:
The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA
between 1920 and 2000.
This line graph compares the birth rates of China and USA between the years of 1920 and 2000. It can be clearly seen that the birth rate of USA is twice higher than China in the end of the year of 2000.
In the year 1920, the China’s birth rate was around 10, while USA was a little bit higher than it. Then, the following years to 1955 was very fluctuative for both them. The extremely rise happenned in 1950, the birth rate of China was 20, followed by USA was 15. From then until 2000 their rate fell consistently but there was a slight rise in 1990.
Votes
This essay topic by users
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | kissbiss | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Immosan | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 78 | view |
Essay Categories
Essays by user radikalyuda
:
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of differentages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feat 73
- The Chart shows the fertility rates in China and USA from 1920 to 2000. 67
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- People leaving rural areas 67
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro MRT systems around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...rth rate was around 10, while USA was a little bit higher than it. Then, the following yea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 452.0 965.302439024 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 108.0 196.424390244 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.18518518519 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.22370979547 3.73543355544 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04350823975 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 67.0 106.607317073 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62037037037 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 127.8 283.868780488 45% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 12.5432584815 43.030603864 29% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.3333333333 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314436087231 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182745358458 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145548493461 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289719567984 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117207087062 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 13.2329268293 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.73 11.4140731707 59% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.28 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 12.0 40.7170731707 29% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.