The pie chart illustrates the factors that lead to farming deterioration, and the table compares those issues in three different countries between 1990 - 2000.
Overall, there are four main activities, destroying farming in mankind history which most of them came from over-grazing. As well, compared to other countries on the list, Europe was affected at the highest level by those activities.
First of all, the listed activities, over-grazing, over-cultivation, deforestation and other, affected directly to farming in terms of less production. Over-grazing accounted for 35% of the total while over-cultivation and deforestation were about 30% each. The rest came from other factors at only 7%.
North America, Europe and Oceania were the sample areas that confronted these situations at different intensities. 23% of land in Europe were affected by these problems where deforestation, the most contribution, accounted for 9.8%. This was followed by Oceania, 11.3 of 13% of its land was low quality because of over-grazing. However, there was a minor effect in North America at only 5%, coming from 3.3% for over-cultivation, 0.2% for deforestation and 1.5% from over-grazing.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled.They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 78
- The charts below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 61
- The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 78
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.Do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, well, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61666666667 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38442775226 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627777777778 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9493348914 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0947381320196 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414168313373 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380999903569 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572797066267 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200898280573 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.