The bar charts show information ownership, with expanded information about the level of education, from 2002 to 2010.
As shown in the first bar chart, computer ownership bar chat, you can witness a steady increase in the percentage of people who owned a home computer over the period. In 2002, just half the population owned a computer, whereas in 2010 the percentage increased to almost 80%. The second bar chart, computer ownership by education level bar chart, shows that with the increase in the levels of education, there is a remarkable increase in the percentage levels of computer ownership.
In 2002, almost 15% of people with no high school diploma owned a computer, but in 2010 it was trebled. There is a considerable increase among all levels of education. For instance, for those with a high school diploma or an unfinished education, there is approximately a 30% rise in levels of owning a computer. However, the greatest level of ownership in 2010 was shown to be people who are graduates or postgraduates.
Overall, in the last 10 years(decade) there was a constant growth in computer ownership across all levels of education.
- The graph below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 an 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compar 67
- The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment. What factors may have caused this situation and what, in your opinion, can/should be done about it? 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...wnership in 2010 was shown to be people who are graduates or postgraduates. Overall,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, whereas, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02617801047 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90760283004 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492146596859 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0216780524 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278669471498 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12969339639 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798811963694 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188610515017 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885605625064 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.