The line chart illustrate fuel use in USA from 1980 and an estimate upto 2030.
Overal, petrol and oil is the popular form of energy used and it is projected to continue increasing until 2030. Coal and natural gas was averagely used at the same rate interchangeably, until 2020 were it is estimated that coal will be highly used than natural gas. Three power sources namely, nuclear, solar or wind and hydropower are marginally used and will continue steadily into 2030 as forecasted.
It is noticeable that, petrol and oil is the major source of fuel, at 35 quadrillion units in 1980. The rate was intermittently rising and falling steadily upto 1995, and increased dramatically untill 2015. It is projected to be the major source of fuel by 2030, at 50 quadrillion.
Furthermore, consumption of coal and natural gas was at average, 15 and 20 quadrillion units respectively. The increasing and decreasing rate of these fuel sources was interchangeable until 2015. Coal became popular compared to gas at approximately 28 quadrillion units in 2030 as estimated. Gas will have a usage rate of about 25 quadrillion units as it remain constant from 2015 to 2030.
In addition, nuclear, solar or wind and hydropower use remain marginalised. Beginning 1980, they all had an equal consumption rate of about 4 quadrillion units until 1985. The mostly used fuel among the three was nuclear, it will continued to fluctuate gradually to about 5 quadrillion by 2030, as forecasted. Further, solar or wind and hydropower rose interchangeably upto 2005, when solar or wind was averagely used and will be used at the same rate in 2030. Hydropower will remain constant until 2030, at below 5 quadrillion units as projected
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 67
- The bar chart below shows figures of annual coffee and meat consumption 73
- Some people think that intelligence is innate while others think that we can improve our intelligence through learning. 61
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. 73
- Government should spend more money on railways than roads.To what extend do you agree or disagree. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...e same rate interchangeably, until 2020 were it is estimated that coal will be highl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at average, 15 and 20 quadrillion units respectively. The increasing and decreas...
^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pectively. The increasing and decreasing rate of these fuel sources was interchan...
^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estimated. Gas will have a usage rate of about 25 quadrillion units as it remain ...
^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The mostly used fuel among the three was nuclear, it will continued to fluctuate ...
^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'continue'
Suggestion: continue
...l among the three was nuclear, it will continued to fluctuate gradually to about 5 quadr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 965.302439024 149% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03157894737 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01739289708 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452631578947 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 283.868780488 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0242850797 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.625 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114210090349 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537036027701 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412867373386 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081146621315 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226930293995 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.