The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USAsince 1980 with projections until 2030
The chart compares the amount of energy consumed for six different fuel products in America during a period of 50 years starting 1980.
Overall, it is evident that the number of energy consumption for petrol and oil is highest than that of others over the period shown. Also, while the energy consumption for Hydropower fall slightly, there are gradual increases for petrol and oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear and solar/wind.
In 1980, petrol/oil which was highest, at 35 quadrillion units, compared with 20 and around 16 for natural gas and coal respectively. The numbers of consumption for nuclear, solar/wind, hydropower were same, at about 4 quadrillion units by 1980.
In 2030, the amount of use for petrol and oil is predicted to rise to about 45 quadrillion units, while the figures are anticipated to go up to 30, 25, 6 and 8 for coal, natural gas, solar/wind and hydropower respectively. In contrast, the consumption for hydropower is expected to decline to over 2 quadrillion units by 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-19 | Janaserene | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 73
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 46
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0119760479 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91794385775 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580838323353 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4019510578 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121064724724 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721651520577 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0198781787732 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830376056955 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159326922931 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.