The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030

The line graph illustrates the consumption of 6 types of energy in the America from 1980 to 2030. The data is based on a report conducted in 2008.
Overall, it can be seen that the amount of energy consumed in the USA had a tendency to slight rise over a period of 50 years. Furthermore, petrol and oil were the most preferred fuels by American consumers.
In 1980, the petrol and oil consumption in the USA was 35 quadrillion, which was nearly twice as much as these figures for natural gas and coal, which were only responsible for 20 and around 15 quadrillion, respectively. Over a 5-decade period, petrol and oil are still the most popular energy compared to others. According to forecast, American citizens can totally consume up to 47 quadrillion in 2030. At the meantime, while natural gas usage is going to steadily increase, reaching at 23 units, the consumption of coal experiences a relatively rapid growth at over 30 units in comparison with the initial data.
Besides, the consumption indexes of the three remaining types of energy were quite similar in the first years until 1990, at around 4 quadrillion. After that, nuclear fuel surpassed other energy to stand at the first position in total consumption in 2030, at 8 units. However, there were no significant changes in the usage of solar or wind and hydropower over the period of 50 years.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7914893617 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77383493624 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0850516291 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.363636364 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19700354049 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796577236632 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806393968588 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146639557274 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111831442421 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.