It is a common knowledge that tourism beyond national boundaries exerts numerous positive impacts on host countries. Besides that, international tourism is also regarded as a pressing concern because of many drawbacks in terms of the environment and the local people. From a personal perspective, I strongly argue that the enormous benefits tourism industry, stemming from international visitors, has brought outweighs the disadvantages it imposes.
On the one hand, tourists from other countries can pose a threat to the natural environment and indigenous inhabitants' life. Firstly, the environment degradation is increasingly popular due to the soaring demand of international travelers for experiencing ecotourism. As a result, for the sake of short-sighted finance, natural habitats have to suffer serious damages such as lack of shelter for wild animals, the imbalance of flora and fauna, pollution related to water, air and soil. Apart from various negative influences on the living environment, international tourism also affects on the lifestyle of local people. Because of the import of new cultural values from global visitors, people, especially youngsters, easily lose the sense of belongings, which leads to the extinction of traditional customs and indigenous practices in the long run. For example, nowadays, Vietnamese minority ethnics distributed in mountainous areas are no longer appear with colorful traditional costumes and are gradually replaced by modern high-fashion clothes by abroad travelers.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that international tourism industry can bring more beneficial than harmful for several reasons. First and foremost, economical development is one of the biggest advantages resulting from the wave of travelling overseas. The appearance of international tourist not only opens more job opportunities for the unemployed but also attracts more investments from international organizations, which contributes to boosting the growth rate and promoting globalization process. Moreover, local people are able to excess to exotic culture with no expense. Thanks to observing foreigners' behavior and habits, people are likely to acquire more precious knowledge and gain deeper cultural understanding.
In conclusion, despite some drawbacks mentioned above, I would argue that international tourism has more advantages than disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'common knowledge'.
Suggestion: common knowledge
It is a common knowledge that tourism beyond national boundaries...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'benefits'' or 'benefit's'?
Suggestion: benefits'; benefit's
...ive, I strongly argue that the enormous benefits tourism industry, stemming from interna...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'inhabitants'' or 'inhabitant's'?
Suggestion: inhabitants'; inhabitant's
... the natural environment and indigenous inhabitants life. Firstly, the environment degradat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...or several reasons. First and foremost, economical development is one of the biggest advan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93333333333 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23576682342 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614492753623 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4839856045 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.466666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269419974988 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086784760451 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072055018681 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174993395286 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854085258495 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.