The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares figures for 3 types of unhealthy foods
different consumed by the Mauritian adolescence between 1985
and 2015.
The initial impression from graph is that there were two opposite
trends for these 3 figures. While the number of hamburgers and
fried chicken eaten during the year by the Mauritian teens keep
going up, the number of people who eaten pizza declined over the
same period.
Starting at a lowest point, the consumption of fried chicken by
teenagers rocketed rapidly to 60 times per year in 2005, but later it
remains steady in the next 5 years. After remaining static from
2005 to 2010, that figure growth moderately at 62 times per year.
In addition, hamburgers consumed by adolescence soared quickly
from 10 times to more than 70 times per year and reached the
highest compared to the other 2 foods in the last year.
Turning into the downward trend of the other two, pizza is fast
food consumed by the Mauritian teenagers tumbled swiftly to
about 20 times in 2010, and then it continued to plummet to the
lowest point at 10 times per year until 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-03 | Anh15799 | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 73
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 73
- Video records are better to learn about the way other people in the world lives than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree It seems to be an increasingly widespread controversy about the method of learning in people nowadays video reco 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ned over the same period. Starting at a lowest point, the consumption of fried ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88947368421 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37076492209 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6706387194 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.714285714 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 17.0 3.83414634146 443% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0937615154267 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474248834086 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290922779556 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0293780245797 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258032117578 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.