The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15

The line graph represents data from a 2008 statistic on the consume of
6 different kinds of energy in the United States from 1980 with a
forecast to 2030.
The initial impression from graph is that coal and natural gas were
consumed with an average amount of energy, the largest being petrol
and oil. By contrast, the other 3 types of energy were used fewer
quadrillion units over the same period.
Starting at a quite high point, the amount of petrol and oil consumed
fluctuated to more than 40 million units in 2020, after which it will leap
sharply to the highest position at 49 quadrillion units in the year 2030.
There was a wave to 25 million units in USA natural gas consumption
between 1980 and 2015, but later with an estimate that it won’t
change until 2030. In addition, coal energy used upsurged substantially
from 16 to more than 25 quadrillion units over 40 years. With the
calculation, the amount of coal will continue to rise significantly in the
next 10 years at 31 quadrillion units.
Besides, the amount of nuclear energy consumed went up slightly to 7
million units in 2010, it is expected that will remain steady until the
year 2030. Solar/wind and hydropower are two kinds of energy that
together reached a consumption of 4 quadrillion units during 2005.
According to current prediction, these figures will climb and drop
minimally at 6 and 3 quadrillion units respectively when they reach
2030.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...epresents data from a 2008 statistic on the consume of 6 different kinds of energy in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93902439024 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64947424873 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1440507715 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 3.83414634146 548% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151493191429 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070209295529 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467751671367 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0461270985271 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358898657203 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...epresents data from a 2008 statistic on the consume of 6 different kinds of energy in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93902439024 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64947424873 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1440507715 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 3.83414634146 548% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151493191429 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070209295529 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467751671367 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0461270985271 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358898657203 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.