The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The given line graph represented the quadrillion units of energy consumed in the United States between 1980 and 2030.
Overall, at the first glace, it is clear that since 1980, fuel like petrol and oil has accounted for the majority of American energy use and will likely continue to do so in the future. Otherwise, nuclear, hydroelectric, and solar/wind energy are always used sparingly.
Petrol and oil consistently placed first and far ahead of other fuels from 1980 to 2005. It started at 35 and grown substantially until it reached 40 in 2005. Natural gas and coal come in second position, both of which usually had a start between 15 and 20. After a few years, it was halted at 20 or more. The previous position was around 5, and even though there was a small fluctuation, it ended there in 2005.
From 2005 to 2030, the price of gasoline and oil kept on increasing sharply and was set at around 50. Natural gas and coal both had little variations. However, since 2015, natural gas has stopped at about 25 and has been there until the very end, while coal continues to rise till about 30. solar/wind and delta in nuclear are always very low, making no progress, and are always between 3 and 8. Whereas, hydropower had the lowest number of quadrillion units.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-19 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-06-19 Giang Tran 73 view
2023-12-17 neverlandforestcat 67 view
2023-12-10 brew 78 view
2023-08-15 Trần Như Cát Tường 78 view
Essays by user Giang Tran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Solar
...e coal continues to rise till about 30. solar/wind and delta in nuclear are always ve...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 396, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ogress, and are always between 3 and 8. Whereas, hydropower had the lowest number of qu...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66517857143 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50200413929 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611607142857 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3318042492 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3846153846 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2307692308 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136381060392 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437728997454 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344589258999 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835969358098 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143263431834 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.