The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows consumption of five different types of fuels in the USA between 1980 to 2030. All units are measured in quadrillion.

Overall, it is evident that, the consumption of patrol and oil is higher than all other fuels during the period.

In 1980, 35 quadrillion of patrol and oil used by Americans against the 20 quadrillion natural gas and 15 quadrillion coal in the same year. After 25 years , the usage of all these three fuels increased considerably petrol and oil 40 , natural gas and coal had almost similar figures almost 23 quadrillion. Similarly, the figure for patrol and oil, coal and natural gas expected to rise in future as well and will reach almost 47, 28 and 24 respectively in the year of 2030. Interestingly the usage of coal overtook the natural gas consumption between 2010 and 2005 and then on wards coal maintained a second position in terms of consumption of fuels till the end.

On the contrary, there is no significant changes in the cases of remaining fuels. the consumption of nuclear and solar/wind, will increase nominally comparing to its beginning figures from below 5 to almost 5. Whereas, hydro power remained stable thorough out the period expect some fluctuations .

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph shows consumption of five different type...
^^
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...five different types of fuels in the USA between 1980 to 2030. All units are meas...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l units are measured in quadrillion. Overall, it is evident that, the consum...
^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llion. Overall, it is evident that, the consumption of patrol and oil is hi...
^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that, the consumption of patrol and oil is higher than all other fuels during th...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n all other fuels during the period. In 1980, 35 quadrillion of patrol and oi...
^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quadrillion coal in the same year. After 25 years , the usage of all these three ...
^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n coal in the same year. After 25 years , the usage of all these three fuels incr...
^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these three fuels increased considerably petrol and oil 40 , natural gas and coal...
^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ncreased considerably petrol and oil 40 , natural gas and coal had almost similar...
^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...future as well and will reach almost 47, 28 and 24 respectively in the year of 20...
^^
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oal overtook the natural gas consumption between 2010 and 2005 and then on wards ...
^^
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... wards coal maintained a second position in terms of consumption of fuels till th...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of consumption of fuels till the end. On the contrary, there is no significan...
^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...anges in the cases of remaining fuels. the consumption of nuclear and solar/wind, ...
^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase nominally comparing to its beginning figures from below 5 to almost 5. Where...
^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...comparing to its beginning figures from below 5 to almost 5. Whereas, hydro powe...
^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing figures from below 5 to almost 5. Whereas, hydro power remained stable thorough o...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... out the period expect some fluctuations .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, similarly, so, then, well, whereas, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95631067961 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80664326198 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606796116505 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.477522413 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 1.69756097561 1119% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0740550482825 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336181736991 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462762440778 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582380024546 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417011700562 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.