The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007.
The graph chart depicts the data regarding car ownership in Britain over almost 40 years which starting from 1971.
Overall, it is clearly evident that people with single car was the peak point while people with no car declined till the end. And people with more than one or two car increased slightly in that duration.
Looking into more details, the number of who had a single car fluctuated between this three and half decade which started from about 44% and ended with the level-off this same percentage. The highest rise in single car ownership visibled in that five year which began from 1995. The number of having two or three car augmented slowly. In total, by approximately 5% growth observed in the following years.
At the beginning period, only at about 8% people had two car. Then this percentage showed upward and oscillated trend and moved to almost 27% in this fourty years. However, the information of people who had no car showed opposite trend. The data proved that having no car had a sharp decrease and turned into nearly 25% in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | view | |
| 2022-10-12 | DOT BABA | 78 | view |
- The three bar charts show the level of participation education and science in developing and industrialised countries in1980 and 1990 73
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ears which starting from 1971. Overall, it is clearly evident that people with ...
^^
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1. Overall, it is clearly evident that people with single car was the peak poin...
^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'car' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cars'.
Suggestion: cars
...d. And people with more than one or two car increased slightly in that duration. ...
^^^
Line 4, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duration. Looking into more details, the number of who had a single car flu...
^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o more details, the number of who had a single car fluctuated between this three...
^^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'car' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cars'.
Suggestion: cars
...1995. The number of having two or three car augmented slowly. In total, by approxi...
^^^
Line 4, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or three car augmented slowly. In total, by approximately 5% growth observed in t...
^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'car' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cars'.
Suggestion: cars
...period, only at about 8% people had two car. Then this percentage showed upward and...
^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percentage showed upward and oscillated trend and moved to almost 27% in this fo...
^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lmost 27% in this fourty years. However, the information of people who had no car...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76630434783 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27565581856 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5398005577 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7272727273 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254649249476 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923742239063 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077431222375 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161204708112 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830149314701 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.