The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the rates between the birth and the death in New Zealand from 1901 to 2101. This essay will present the key observations of the given figure.
Overall, the rate of birth held the lion’s share of the given figure nearly at 65 thousand in 1961 which is always almost higher than the death between 1901 and 2041.
From the line graph, it was clear that the birth rate commenced 20 thousand in 1901 then it modestly increased over the given figure. The birth rate rose slightly before growing considerably and hitting the highest point at 66 thousand in 1961. The ratio of birth recovered and rose steadily after dropping considerably around at 50 thousand in 1981.
The death rate began at 10 thousand in the first stage of the given period before showing an upward fluctuation over the period of 100 years from 1901 to 2001. There is a remarkable growth in the ratio of death between 2001 and 2061 then will remain stable to 2101. Featuring a notable change, the rate of the birth and the death are predicted to stay at the same level in 2014 with around at 50 thousand then the death will surpass the death at the end of the given period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-10 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 78
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 78
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 61
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What causes and what are the problems 61
- The table below presents the number of children ever born to women aged 40 44 years in Australia for each year the information was collected since 1981 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he rates between the birth and the death in New Zealand from 1901 to 2101. This e...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rably around at 50 thousand in 1981. The death rate began at 10 thousand in the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6018957346 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22085328285 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497630331754 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7706624128 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200238081445 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103859915874 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970177906635 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148876623494 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591347244055 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.